So much has happened! Where do we go from here? Please join us in conversation and share your ideas about being part of the Catholic Church in 2005.
A newspaper article reported on two old Japanese soldiers who had been hiding on an island in the Philippines, unaware that WWII was over. They originally hid because they never got the approval from the Emperor to go home. Imagine living in fear for 60 years, afraid of something that doesn't exist, not knowing all is forgiven and you can just go home. What a metaphor...
I must admit to being a bit saddened by the events of this past week. This blog was overtaken by a group of ultra-conservative folks who have a view of the Catholic Church which most of us learned and rejected back in the 1950s and 60s. Perhaps there are still many people around who believe in a vengeful God who will send us to hell for our transgressions, but I'm not one of them.
I do feel that conversing with these people can be worthwhile for some, but it's not appropriate for this blog so, for the time being, I've removed the setting which allows comments. What I originally had in mind was intelligent and civil conversation that would explore issues which are unfolding in the Catholic Church of the 21st century. Maybe it is naive to think that this could be the case. But we will try again in a short while and see what happens.
I do feel threatened by people who invade the space of others in an aggressive way. Our conservative visitors not only monopolized the blog but they also vandalized our VOTF NJ website by casting hundreds of ballots on a survey and nullifying all the results. They speak in the name of Jesus and act in a way that Jesus never would. If anyone out there has some encouraging words to offer, please hang onto them. They will be most welcome and appreciated when this blog opens up again.
This blog has been an interesting exercise.
What had started as a place for dialogue has turned into a marketplace for paranoid ideas, vicious ranting, and threats about eternal damnation - all in the name of Jesus!
This is not Catholicism as I understand it, and taking the cue from our bishops, I get to make the rules here. So here they are:
No more posts about hell, fire, punishments, catechisms, the Magisterium and no long scripture quotes. No sermonizing, chastising, criticizing or politicizing. If you have a genuine question or concern that you'd like to share, and would welcome intelligent discussion about it, please feel free to post. If not, please start your own blog.
Let's start a new thread here. There seems to be a lot of discomfort out there with the notion of our own divinity. We are not God we cry! That's blasphemy!
Yet we are the body of Christ. No part of the body can exist without the others says St. Paul. We are the light of the world says Jesus. Christ has no body but ours says St. Teresa.
Does God exist outside us? Can there be a God without every part of creation? The traditional view would have God separate from us, but we know that God is among us, that God is alive in our connectedness.
When we look at our kids, we see God alive. When we see the beauties of nature, we feel the breath of God. God is within these wonders of creation. God is living in this crazy conversation that we're having on this blog! As we used to memorize in the Baltimore catechism, "God is everywhere."
So are we not divine? Or is that word so frightening because it conjures up all kinds of responsibilities that we are not ready to take on.
Isn't it just easier to think that God is "out there" calling the shots, and all we have to do is obey? Is it comforting to call ourselves "God's children" because then the parent tells us what's right and wrong and we don't have to figure it out by ourselves?
These are questions - not answers. Let's explore this issue - not give sermons about it.
I've been thinking a lot about these posts. I have the sense that this is not dialogue, but rather people adamantly stating their points of view with no room for disagreement. We cannot hope to grow if we are not listening.
Long ago, those of us who grew up in the Catholic Church rejected the idea of souls burning in hell. It's not even part of our theology in a literal sense any more. The God of wrath and vindictive punishment is stuff of the past. We know our God is pure love, and that is what we emulate.
I'm taking down the posts which I feel are mean-spirited. This is a place for intelligent conversation - people speaking and listening - and ultimately growing. You're welcome to participate with those parameters in mind.
Today, I read about a reporter who lost his job with the US Jesuit Conference because he wrote something suggesting that we dialog about homosexuality.
Today, I read on this blog that we all have to obey the catechism or go to hell.
And where is the outcry?
If this church ends up in the hands of Carol, and Seeker of the Way and Myers and their ilk, we will all be responsible.
One of our readers, Paul Hennessey, has asked me to post some thoughts he'd like to share about the abortion question. We welcome comments, but ask again that they be offered in the spirit of healthy dialogue, keeping kindness in mind above all.
Abortion is very much in the news today because of the several bishops who would withhold communion from those politicians who have voted in such a way as to be considered pro-choice. Aside from the politics of it, and the normal revulsion to the procedure, thought should be given to the actual theological status of abortion from a catholic perspective.
First, it is obvious that abortion is the taking of life. But, we must consider what kind of life. Swatting a fly, catching a mouse in the kitchen, or slaughtering a pig are everyday takings of life and are considered perfectly moral. Also, the removal of an appendix or a wart; both living human tissues, raises no issues of morality.
However, for a catholic, the killing of a human person is the killing of a life that has an immortal soul – a soul that was destined by God to spend eternity with Him in heaven. Neither the appendix nor the wart has an immortal soul. So, the next question is: Does the human fetus have an immortal soul, and if so, when does it get it.
Few Catholics would question the presence of the soul in the fetus at advanced stage of development. But, consider the millions of fetuses that are aborted naturally with much sorrow and regret. Is it God’s plan to have an immortal soul in all these fetuses? We don’t really know.
St. Augustine speculated that “ensoulment” took place at about five months. St. Thomas Aquinas felt it maybe three months. The point is that they didn’t know. And today, we still don’t know, because we can’t know. The soul is as much a mystery as is the Sacred Body and Blood at communion. We believe fervently, but knowing is a different thing.
Which brings up the next question: If we, the church, the people of God can’t know the time of ensoulment, how can we, the church, maintain dogmatically that from the moment of conception, we are speaking of a human being with an immortal soul? Is there not room for discussion and perhaps more than a single opinion?
The church has been in error before on matters which they did not know and which they held dogmatically. Consider the question of whether the sun rotates around the earth or visa-versa. Galileo was imprisoned for his thoughts on this, and the church was not only going to deny him communion, but was also ready to burn him at the stake.
We do need to let in some fresh air and have some thoughtful discussions.
PMH
4-14-04
Got a brochure today from Ave Maria Press - pretty mainstream. They were advertising a book called God Has No Religion which is a prayer book by an author named Frances Sheridan Goulart (looked up her bio but she doesn't seem to be anything more exotic than a writer, cook and gardener).
Anyway, the title is taken from the words of Mohandas Ghandi. Not a Catholic, but accepted by most as an all-around good guy. So if that's true - about God having no religion - and it sounds reasonable - what's all the fuss about? Shouldn't any path to God be OK?
There will be no name calling on this website. There will be no mean-spirited exchanges. For those of you who are big on rules - those are the rules.
All comments must be posted in a spirit of loving kindness or they will be removed.
Went to my high school reunion this weekend (suffice it to say it wasn't my 10th!). Lots of aging baby boomers there - and after exchanging pix of the kids and grandkids, talk turned to the Catholic Church (since this is a Catholic high school that's been around for 150 years!)
Little rage - much apathy, disdain - some concern, especially about the Tom Reese firing - some still working for the church, though not many - very few practicing Catholics among the offspring.
Of course, this isn't a scientific sample. I wonder how typical it is.
Filled St. Mark's Lutheran Church last night with a crowd interested in hearing about women's roles in the Catholic Church. There are a number of folks out there taking very courageous steps. They are putting their necks on the line, and may get their heads cut off at the end. But then again, so did many saints and martyrs who did what they believed was right. And of course, there was Jesus.....
Our VOTF group meeting was prohibited from meeting at Loyola Retreat House tonight because Bishop Serratelli decided that our speaker disagreed with Catholic teaching, and somehow he felt he had the right to bar us from church property.
Imagine. Our parents and grandparents came to this country to seek freedom. Their dimes and quarters built every Catholic structure in this country. Now, their children would like to use those buildings to speak freely. And they are banned. Censored. Not allowed.
What irony.
This blog was set up to allow open dialogue, and for that reason, those who post may do that anonymously. In that way, we can have freer conversation since, unfortunately, healthy interchange without consequences has not been the hallmark of our church.
That said, we've got to stay civil. I understand that some of these subjects make us very passionate, but there has to be a lid on the anger or we're definitely not doing things the Jesus way.
Learning how to have adult conversations can be a real benefit of participating in this blog. We Catholics haven't had a lot of practice.
from Newsday....
"The editor of America, an influential Jesuit weekly magazine, has resigned under orders from the Vatican, which threatened to impose a 'board of censors' to oversee the magazine if he stayed."
Has it begun? Is this the start of the orthodox Catholic Church where there is no room for dissent or even discussion? By all accounts, Fr. Thomas Reese, the America editor, had printed both sides of controversial issues, but the fact that he had addressed them at all was unacceptable to church hierarchy.
A board of censors? This was still the USA when last we looked.....
You can feel it in the air. The passion is gone; the concern has turned to a general malaise; the commitment has dwindled; the numbers are down.
Even in places that are seemingly successful, it's forced. Catholic high schools were "directed" to send students to the youth rally at Delbarton on Sunday; the few thriving parishes are often cultish, gathering around the personality of one priest, or the philosophy of a religious order.
Where it is headed? We live day to day wondering, feeling very limited in what we can do to affect the outcome. Yet we still try to be of service to those who are on their journey to God. And maybe in the end, that's what's most important.
Is this the new, official Catholic theme? There's no room for dissent here. Obey or find something else to your liking.
Our new Pope has made it clear that he'll be just as happy with a smaller, "purer" church, as have others in positions of authority. Is everybody OK with that? What makes us Catholic anyway?
During today's liturgy, we discussed three stories in the news: the bride in Georgia who fled from her wedding and left the groom and 600 guests behind; the woman in the Bronx who unplugged her son from life support; a surrogate mother who gave birth to five babies and refused to take any payment.
I can imagine Jesus in 2005 doing parables about these kinds of stories. And I'll also bet that he wouldn't have condemned any of the people involved. Why do we feel it's so necessary to judge the actions of others? We could discuss these three cases for days and come to no definite conclusions, because we can't be in the hearts of the people involved.
We talk about Absolutism and Relativism, but they're just words. The stories are made up of real people with real lives.
